Category: Uncategorized

Today we talked about the symbolism of the mark of the beast and apocalyptic events described in Revelations. There’s a bunch of science fiction around the apocalypse, and the Fallout series and Blade Runner stand out to me in the context of the Bible. When (or if) the apocalypse happens, the believers of Jesus Christ with be saved from the torment of the world while the rest of humanity will be left behind to fight, survive, and suffer without a savior. The Fallout games are set in a post-apocalyptic nuclear war in 2177 to 2287 (depending on the specific game in the franchise you play, the year can vary). Specifically, in Fallout 4 you play as a veteran who escapes into a nuclear fallout shelter as the bombs are dropped a few miles from his home. The shelters that house the remainder of humanity are mostly used as human experimentation facilities, and your fallout shelter cryogenically froze humans to see how long they could survive in that state. You wake up 210 years later to the post-apocalyptic world. With a biblical lens, you could look at the nuclear bombs dropping as the kingdom of heaven opening to save the believers, while the rest get left behind. Those who remain live in a brutal and terrible reality. Blade Runner can be viewed in a similar way; it’s a dystopian future where life is bleak, and corporations have more control over culture and laws than the government. The reality of this fictional story could be viewed as the kingdom of heaven having already saved its believers, and what we see on screen is the people being left behind to suffer.

The mark of the beast was an interesting discussion, because I love deep diving into the internet to find the most bizarre conspiracy theories out there, and unfortunately you don’t have to dive that deep to find them. Going over the Bill Gates and Barney are the antichrist conspiracies was very entertaining and shows how biblical interpretation and texts can be used in destructive and unhelpful ways.

I think that it was important for historians and archaeologists to find some physical evidence that Jesus could have walked the Earth. While this piece still has many unanswered questions, I believe that it will help historians understand what might be left behind to prove the existence of Jesus. I had never heard of this discovery before, and think it is interesting to see the different cultural practices from the past. Since it is extremely hard to find evidence and definitively say that it was from one specific era and shows evidence for the existence of stories that we hear, finding these breakthrough pieces help paint a clearer picture of what the past was like. In the instance of James, Jesus’ brother, I think that it is important that we understand what type of person that we think that he was and how he might have followed and practiced religion. Especially, when looking for evidence of Jesus.

I found the topic of Jesus’s siblings and family to be one of the most entertaining of the semester. It’s so odd to think about being one of Jesus’s brothers or sisters. You’d literally be living in the shadow of the most famous human of all time. Looking at things like sibling rivalries is another thought provoking idea. Assuming his siblings were followers of him, it would be beyond condescending to have your sibling also be fully God. It’s a shame that we don’t have more definite proof of their existence or their true relationship to Jesus because I feel as though their insight may be helpful in our understanding of Jesus, Christianity, and even religion in general.

I thought the conversation around archeological evidence presented was very interesting. The fact that when unqualified people possibly dig up what could be a religious artifact, completely invalidates what is being presented is such a tragic thought, especially when it completely supports something so big and important. It’s incredibly disappointing to see the connection between archeology and religion completely fall apart when people either dig up important objects irresponsibly or pass things along inauthentically. It is also interesting how people would be willing to pass along something so significant as an authentic work. It kind of makes you realize how important religion is, that people are willing to create fake documents or artifacts.

When Dr. McGrath asked us the question if Jesus had brothers and sisters, my immediate thought was of course not. I had never even considered the question if Jesus had siblings, because it always seemed that he was an only child. It surprised me when he showed us Bible verses that appear to mention that he has siblings. It’s debated, however, if these are just half siblings since Joseph had been married before, or maybe they are just cousins. Then this led to the discussion of the bone box that is inscribed with “Jesus brother of Joseph son of James” and the importance of having the proper credentials and documentation in order to take something like this into consideration. This goes with the major theme of the whole class: not just taking information at face value, but really digging into the legitimacy and expertise of the person giving you this information.

Discussing the letters of Paul led to many new discoveries for me. Firstly, I never realized that Saul and Paul were actually the same person. Paul has a very important role in Christianity by spreading the word and teachings of Jesus. What was really interesting to me, however, was reading about the relationship between Paul’s letters and race relations. Apparently in the arguments over slavery in the 1800s, those who were for slavery used the letters of Paul to emphasize the submitting of slaves to their masters. However, most people seem to look at Galatians 3:28—“There is neither Jew nor Greek, male and female, slave or free, but we are all one—you are all one in Christ Jesus.” I think that is one of the best things in the Bible, and something I think all Christians need to remember.

Before class today, I wasn’t really aware that there was a dichotomy among Christians about James, Paul, and Jesus’ siblings. Of course, I knew that there was somewhat of a rift involving whether good deeds are of saving quality or if they just come with the Christian faith. I was taught the latter in my church, and it makes sense that it mostly focused on Paul’s teachings as well. I can understand where both are coming from, since you can’t have a change of heart without acting upon it, because to me that doesn’t really signal a change. Falling out of old habits is hard, but necessary and that goes along with growing as a Christian, in my experience of the spiritual side of Christianity. Growing up I was also taught that Jesus was not an only child (obviously he was in the sense of being God’s son of by the Holy Spirit) and had siblings through his earthly parents. However, James was really the only one we talked about. I suppose that’s what the Bible focuses on and perhaps that explains it. I’m glad this class has given me an opportunity to learn about different belief systems and denominations so that I can more respectfully converse with those outside of my own tradition.

When it comes Jesus a lot is know about his journey but a little bout his family lineage. We know his father was God and his mother Mary and Marys extended family, however nothing is known from there. Did Jesus have siblings not meaning other children of God but the Bible does not mentioned that Mary had other children. The reason I bring this up is because of the bone box labeled “Jesus brother of Joseph son of James”, could this be actual proof of Jesus having a sibling or an accident, maybe even planted there. There are a multitude of reasons why this has been critiqued as much as it has. In class we talked about the necessity of credentials. The location of this item would have to have geological resemblance in order to take it into account and in those important archeological areas you have to be qualified. With this it is imperative to have proper documentation to prove its legitimacy to that location along with biblical relevancy. Overall it is possible for this to be true but the odds are not in its favor.

In class we talked about the authenticity of the bone box that was inscribed with “Jesus brother of Joseph son of James.” The ossuary was found on the antiquity market and not dug up through proper methods of excavation and documentation. I was reminded of sci-fi media that focuses on archeology like Tomb Raider and Indiana Jones. We talked about the necessity of credentials when unearthing items like these, because it’s crucial for proper documentation to happen for the history of items like these to be correctly theorized. Indiana Jones is a professor of archeology, but throughout the movies, he does little to properly document his finding, and sometimes his actions are rarely done through legal channels. Lara Croft from Tomb Raider is more of a professional grave robber than an archeologist. In the Tomb Raider games, the adventures and findings of Lara Croft are all secret and unofficial, so the history of what she finds is usually lost.

Growing up, it was hard to see Jesus as a normal human being. To me, he was basically an all mighty figure who was able to grant miracles and was the son of God. However, Jesus was a man as well. He had parents, and he might of has siblings. That is something that has been debated for a while now. Whether or not Jesus had siblings.

In the Bible, the brothers and sisters of Jesus have brought up. Some of the names mentioned were: James, Joses, Judas, and Simon. However, we were told that Mary was a virgin, and sought to always be a virgin, so were these her children? There are arguments that these are the children of Mary’s sister, which would make them cousins (therefore using the term brothers and sisters as a figure of speech). However, there are other theories that they were children from a previous marriage of Joseph, which would technically make them half siblings (or step siblings considering the fact that Jesus was the son of God). I am drawn to believe the second argument, but it is a topic that is still a controversy to this day.